Skip to content
compliancebase
SOC 2CC7 — Recovery from Security Incidents

CC7.5

Recovery from Security Incidents

SOC 2 · 2017 TSC (2022 Revised Points of Focus) · Last verified July 2026

Objective

The entity identifies, develops, and implements activities to recover from identified security incidents.

Points of focus

  • Restores the affected environment to functional operation
  • Communicates information about the event and recovery actions to management and others as appropriate
  • Determines root cause of the event
  • Implements changes to prevent and detect recurrences
  • Improves response and recovery procedures from lessons learned
  • Implements periodic incident-recovery plan testing

Implementation notes

CC7.5 requires planned recovery from security incidents: rebuild or restore systems, communicate what happened and what changed, find root cause, and implement preventive and detective improvements. SaaS teams should standardize blameless postmortems with owners and due dates, verify corrective actions before closing the incident record, and feed lessons into detection rules and the IR plan. Pair application-level recovery with backup restore testing and, where availability is claimed, broader DR exercises that include loss of key people and critical dependencies. Document test scenarios, participants, results, and plan revisions. AICPA points of focus explicitly expect periodic incident-recovery plan testing — untested backups are a frequent audit and operational failure mode.

Audit tip: Link each material incident to a postmortem, completed corrective actions, and — at least annually — a recovery test with observed results.

Evidence auditors typically request:

  • Post-incident review / blameless postmortem with root cause and action items
  • Tickets proving preventive control changes (patches, detections, access fixes)
  • Updated IR or recovery procedures after lessons learned
  • Backup restore or incident-recovery test records for the period
  • Management communication summarizing recovery status

Common gaps

  • Incidents closed when service is 'up' with no root-cause analysis
  • Action items from postmortems never completed or verified
  • No recovery testing — backups unproven
  • IR plan unchanged despite repeated similar incidents

Cross-Framework Mapping

FrameworkRequirementImplementation note
SOC 2CC7.5This control
ISO 27001A.5.27, A.5.29, A.5.30Learning from incidents, disruption readiness, and ICT continuity
HIPAA164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B), 164.308(a)(7)(ii)(C)Disaster recovery and emergency mode operations
GDPRArticle 32(1)(c)Ability to restore availability and access to personal data in a timely manner

Primary sources

Frequently Asked Questions

They overlap. CC7.5 is specifically recovery from identified security incidents, including root cause and control improvements. Broader BCP/DR often also supports availability criteria (A1.x) and CC9.1. Map evidence carefully rather than dumping one DR binder into every criterion.

At least annually is a common baseline; higher-risk systems may test restores quarterly. Include realistic scenarios, key-person absence, and revision of plans based on results — matching the CC7.5 testing point of focus.

Timeline, impact, root cause, what worked/failed in detection and response, corrective actions with owners and dates, and communication summary. Auditors sample whether actions closed, not whether the write-up was polished.

Still show recovery capability: restore tests, backup verification, and an IR plan that includes recovery steps. If incidents occurred, recovery and lessons-learned artifacts become primary evidence.

Article 32(1)(c) emphasizes the ability to restore availability and access to personal data in a timely manner. Restore tests and recovery procedures used for CC7.5 often support that GDPR measure, alongside encryption and resilience controls.

Framework versions referenced in this page:

  • SOC 22017 TSC (2022 Revised Points of Focus)

Last verified: July 2026 · Primary sources linked above